Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 230
- Any relief granted
- 16.5%
- Denied
- 83.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 77.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +6.4 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 176
- Any relief granted
- 38.6%
- Denied
- 61.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -10.1 pp
Court denial position: 24th percentile
Judge outcome spread
21 qualifying direct judges · P25 64.4% · Median 69.8% · P75 76.9% · IQR 12.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 702
- Any relief granted
- 19.1%
- Denied
- 80.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 57.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +23.6 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 207
- Any relief granted
- 29.5%
- Denied
- 70.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 58.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +11.8 pp
Court denial position: Rank 2 of 7 · 86th percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 55.0% · Median 60.3% · P75 65.6% · IQR 10.6%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,451
- Any relief granted
- 39.3%
- Denied
- 60.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 58.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +2.0 pp
Court denial position: Rank 3 of 7 · 71st percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 55.0% · Median 60.3% · P75 65.6% · IQR 10.6%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 148
- Any relief granted
- 14.2%
- Denied
- 85.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 49.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +36.8 pp
Court denial position: 83rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
12 qualifying direct judges · P25 54.7% · Median 62.0% · P75 70.5% · IQR 15.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 506
- Any relief granted
- 35.6%
- Denied
- 64.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 76.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -12.1 pp
Court denial position: 19th percentile
Judge outcome spread
16 qualifying direct judges · P25 67.9% · Median 76.6% · P75 85.4% · IQR 17.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 424
- Any relief granted
- 39.6%
- Denied
- 60.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -11.2 pp
Court denial position: 23rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
13 qualifying direct judges · P25 62.1% · Median 68.8% · P75 75.9% · IQR 13.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 974
- Any relief granted
- 9.4%
- Denied
- 90.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 85.8%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +4.8 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 193
- Any relief granted
- 60.1%
- Denied
- 39.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 58.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -18.2 pp
Court denial position: Rank 5 of 5 · 20th percentile
Judge outcome spread
5 qualifying direct judges · P25 45.7% · Median 63.1% · P75 82.2% · IQR 36.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.