Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 507
- Any relief granted
- 36.1%
- Denied
- 63.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -6.4 pp
Court denial position: 45th percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 58.2% · Median 80.3% · P75 88.3% · IQR 30.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 354
- Any relief granted
- 24.0%
- Denied
- 76.0%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +5.9 pp
Court denial position: 40th percentile
Judge outcome spread
15 qualifying direct judges · P25 74.6% · Median 82.9% · P75 90.9% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 202
- Any relief granted
- 6.4%
- Denied
- 93.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 79.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +14.0 pp
Court denial position: 94th percentile
Judge outcome spread
18 qualifying direct judges · P25 77.4% · Median 83.7% · P75 88.5% · IQR 11.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 438
- Any relief granted
- 31.5%
- Denied
- 68.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 72.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -3.8 pp
Court denial position: 27th percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 71.1% · Median 82.1% · P75 87.5% · IQR 16.4%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 154
- Any relief granted
- 6.5%
- Denied
- 93.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 88.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +5.5 pp
Court denial position: Rank 1 of 5 · 100th percentile
Judge outcome spread
5 qualifying direct judges · P25 88.8% · Median 89.9% · P75 92.7% · IQR 3.9%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 744
- Any relief granted
- 42.6%
- Denied
- 57.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 57.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -0.2 pp
Court denial position: Rank 7 of 8 · 25th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 57.8% · Median 66.4% · P75 74.1% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 228
- Any relief granted
- 32.9%
- Denied
- 67.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -4.4 pp
Court denial position: 48th percentile
Judge outcome spread
21 qualifying direct judges · P25 64.4% · Median 69.8% · P75 76.9% · IQR 12.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 140
- Any relief granted
- 45.7%
- Denied
- 54.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 52.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +1.7 pp
Court denial position: Rank 7 of 7 · 14th percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 62.1% · Median 65.9% · P75 66.8% · IQR 4.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 333
- Any relief granted
- 18.6%
- Denied
- 81.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 79.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +2.2 pp
Court denial position: 55th percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 74.5% · Median 81.4% · P75 85.1% · IQR 10.6%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 106
- Any relief granted
- 7.5%
- Denied
- 92.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +22.4 pp
Court denial position: 87th percentile
Judge outcome spread
15 qualifying direct judges · P25 74.6% · Median 82.9% · P75 90.9% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.