Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 145
- Any relief granted
- 10.3%
- Denied
- 89.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 65.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +24.3 pp
Court denial position: 92nd percentile
Judge outcome spread
13 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.1% · P75 80.3% · IQR 20.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 139
- Any relief granted
- 31.7%
- Denied
- 68.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 86.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -18.4 pp
Court denial position: 7th percentile
Judge outcome spread
14 qualifying direct judges · P25 89.3% · Median 91.6% · P75 96.1% · IQR 6.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 291
- Any relief granted
- 11.7%
- Denied
- 88.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 77.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +11.0 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 385
- Any relief granted
- 2.6%
- Denied
- 97.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 97.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +0.1 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 212
- Any relief granted
- 25.0%
- Denied
- 75.0%
- Court denial benchmark
- 85.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -10.1 pp
Court denial position: Rank 5 of 5 · 20th percentile
Judge outcome spread
5 qualifying direct judges · P25 81.2% · Median 87.3% · P75 89.5% · IQR 8.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 801
- Any relief granted
- 13.9%
- Denied
- 86.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 82.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +3.7 pp
Court denial position: 64th percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 79.9% · Median 83.2% · P75 86.8% · IQR 6.9%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,010
- Any relief granted
- 4.1%
- Denied
- 95.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 86.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +9.8 pp
Court denial position: Rank 2 of 10 · 90th percentile
Judge outcome spread
10 qualifying direct judges · P25 83.3% · Median 87.6% · P75 92.4% · IQR 9.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 814
- Any relief granted
- 62.8%
- Denied
- 37.2%
- Court denial benchmark
- 49.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -11.8 pp
Court denial position: 8th percentile
Judge outcome spread
12 qualifying direct judges · P25 54.7% · Median 62.0% · P75 70.5% · IQR 15.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 227
- Any relief granted
- 3.5%
- Denied
- 96.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +26.3 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 908
- Any relief granted
- 41.5%
- Denied
- 58.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 60.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -1.9 pp
Court denial position: Rank 7 of 8 · 25th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.5% · P75 78.6% · IQR 19.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.