Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 172
- Any relief granted
- 14.5%
- Denied
- 85.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 60.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +25.1 pp
Court denial position: Rank 1 of 8 · 100th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.5% · P75 78.6% · IQR 19.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 515
- Any relief granted
- 19.6%
- Denied
- 80.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 79.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +1.2 pp
Court denial position: 45th percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 74.5% · Median 81.4% · P75 85.1% · IQR 10.6%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 547
- Any relief granted
- 37.7%
- Denied
- 62.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 76.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -14.2 pp
Court denial position: 13th percentile
Judge outcome spread
16 qualifying direct judges · P25 67.9% · Median 76.6% · P75 85.4% · IQR 17.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 582
- Any relief granted
- 32.3%
- Denied
- 67.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 57.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +10.1 pp
Court denial position: Rank 4 of 8 · 63rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 57.8% · Median 66.4% · P75 74.1% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 898
- Any relief granted
- 16.3%
- Denied
- 83.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +12.2 pp
Court denial position: 95th percentile
Judge outcome spread
21 qualifying direct judges · P25 64.4% · Median 69.8% · P75 76.9% · IQR 12.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 149
- Any relief granted
- 66.4%
- Denied
- 33.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 41.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -7.6 pp
Court denial position: Rank 6 of 9 · 44th percentile
Judge outcome spread
9 qualifying direct judges · P25 29.6% · Median 42.0% · P75 43.3% · IQR 13.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,277
- Any relief granted
- 21.4%
- Denied
- 78.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 47.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +30.9 pp
Court denial position: 86th percentile
Judge outcome spread
36 qualifying direct judges · P25 49.7% · Median 60.5% · P75 72.8% · IQR 23.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 409
- Any relief granted
- 41.1%
- Denied
- 58.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 65.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -6.5 pp
Court denial position: 23rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
13 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.1% · P75 80.3% · IQR 20.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 428
- Any relief granted
- 7.0%
- Denied
- 93.0%
- Court denial benchmark
- 84.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +8.3 pp
Court denial position: Rank 3 of 7 · 71st percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 78.4% · Median 83.8% · P75 93.1% · IQR 14.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,154
- Any relief granted
- 39.2%
- Denied
- 60.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 52.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +8.2 pp
Court denial position: Rank 6 of 7 · 29th percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 62.1% · Median 65.9% · P75 66.8% · IQR 4.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.