Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 960
- Any relief granted
- 40.2%
- Denied
- 59.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 60.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -0.6 pp
Court denial position: Rank 6 of 8 · 38th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.5% · P75 78.6% · IQR 19.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 561
- Any relief granted
- 10.3%
- Denied
- 89.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 89.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +0.3 pp
Court denial position: 57th percentile
Judge outcome spread
14 qualifying direct judges · P25 86.9% · Median 89.3% · P75 92.1% · IQR 5.2%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 393
- Any relief granted
- 42.7%
- Denied
- 57.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -13.0 pp
Court denial position: 27th percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 58.2% · Median 80.3% · P75 88.3% · IQR 30.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 910
- Any relief granted
- 20.5%
- Denied
- 79.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 61.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +18.3 pp
Court denial position: Rank 3 of 8 · 75th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 53.7% · Median 69.6% · P75 80.9% · IQR 27.2%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 829
- Any relief granted
- 44.9%
- Denied
- 55.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 47.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +7.4 pp
Court denial position: 39th percentile
Judge outcome spread
36 qualifying direct judges · P25 49.7% · Median 60.5% · P75 72.8% · IQR 23.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 234
- Any relief granted
- 72.6%
- Denied
- 27.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 57.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -30.2 pp
Court denial position: Rank 8 of 8 · 13th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 57.8% · Median 66.4% · P75 74.1% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 758
- Any relief granted
- 25.9%
- Denied
- 74.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 86.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -12.0 pp
Court denial position: Rank 10 of 10 · 10th percentile
Judge outcome spread
10 qualifying direct judges · P25 83.3% · Median 87.6% · P75 92.4% · IQR 9.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,020
- Any relief granted
- 44.4%
- Denied
- 55.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 47.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +7.9 pp
Court denial position: 42nd percentile
Judge outcome spread
36 qualifying direct judges · P25 49.7% · Median 60.5% · P75 72.8% · IQR 23.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 163
- Any relief granted
- 16.6%
- Denied
- 83.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +11.9 pp
Court denial position: 90th percentile
Judge outcome spread
21 qualifying direct judges · P25 64.4% · Median 69.8% · P75 76.9% · IQR 12.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 415
- Any relief granted
- 22.9%
- Denied
- 77.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 84.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -7.6 pp
Court denial position: Rank 6 of 7 · 29th percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 78.4% · Median 83.8% · P75 93.1% · IQR 14.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.