Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,150
- Any relief granted
- 13.1%
- Denied
- 86.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 80.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +6.9 pp
Court denial position: Rank 3 of 6 · 67th percentile
Judge outcome spread
6 qualifying direct judges · P25 81.9% · Median 86.9% · P75 88.7% · IQR 6.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 671
- Any relief granted
- 59.6%
- Denied
- 40.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -29.8 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 547
- Any relief granted
- 14.3%
- Denied
- 85.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 79.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +6.5 pp
Court denial position: 82nd percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 74.5% · Median 81.4% · P75 85.1% · IQR 10.6%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 174
- Any relief granted
- 19.5%
- Denied
- 80.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 77.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +3.4 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 269
- Any relief granted
- 11.2%
- Denied
- 88.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 88.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +0.8 pp
Court denial position: Rank 4 of 5 · 40th percentile
Judge outcome spread
5 qualifying direct judges · P25 88.8% · Median 89.9% · P75 92.7% · IQR 3.9%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 415
- Any relief granted
- 0.5%
- Denied
- 99.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 97.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +2.2 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,148
- Any relief granted
- 14.8%
- Denied
- 85.2%
- Court denial benchmark
- 61.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +24.0 pp
Court denial position: Rank 2 of 8 · 88th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 53.7% · Median 69.6% · P75 80.9% · IQR 27.2%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 817
- Any relief granted
- 56.1%
- Denied
- 43.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 47.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -3.8 pp
Court denial position: 19th percentile
Judge outcome spread
36 qualifying direct judges · P25 49.7% · Median 60.5% · P75 72.8% · IQR 23.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 120
- Any relief granted
- 0.0%
- Denied
- 100.0%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +29.7 pp
Court denial position: 100th percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 58.2% · Median 80.3% · P75 88.3% · IQR 30.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 820
- Any relief granted
- 38.5%
- Denied
- 61.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 47.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +13.8 pp
Court denial position: 53rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
36 qualifying direct judges · P25 49.7% · Median 60.5% · P75 72.8% · IQR 23.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.