Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 632
- Any relief granted
- 11.9%
- Denied
- 88.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +16.5 pp
Court denial position: 92nd percentile
Judge outcome spread
13 qualifying direct judges · P25 62.1% · Median 68.8% · P75 75.9% · IQR 13.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 293
- Any relief granted
- 34.8%
- Denied
- 65.2%
- Court denial benchmark
- 47.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +17.5 pp
Court denial position: 58th percentile
Judge outcome spread
36 qualifying direct judges · P25 49.7% · Median 60.5% · P75 72.8% · IQR 23.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 240
- Any relief granted
- 20.4%
- Denied
- 79.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 84.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -5.1 pp
Court denial position: Rank 5 of 7 · 43rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 78.4% · Median 83.8% · P75 93.1% · IQR 14.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 100
- Any relief granted
- 86.0%
- Denied
- 14.0%
- Court denial benchmark
- 42.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -28.0 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 237
- Any relief granted
- 10.5%
- Denied
- 89.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 85.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +4.4 pp
Court denial position: Rank 2 of 5 · 80th percentile
Judge outcome spread
5 qualifying direct judges · P25 81.2% · Median 87.3% · P75 89.5% · IQR 8.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 958
- Any relief granted
- 26.7%
- Denied
- 73.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +1.8 pp
Court denial position: 67th percentile
Judge outcome spread
21 qualifying direct judges · P25 64.4% · Median 69.8% · P75 76.9% · IQR 12.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 323
- Any relief granted
- 22.6%
- Denied
- 77.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 62.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +15.1 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 133
- Any relief granted
- 13.5%
- Denied
- 86.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 60.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +26.0 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 644
- Any relief granted
- 14.9%
- Denied
- 85.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 89.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -4.3 pp
Court denial position: 14th percentile
Judge outcome spread
14 qualifying direct judges · P25 86.9% · Median 89.3% · P75 92.1% · IQR 5.2%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 763
- Any relief granted
- 16.1%
- Denied
- 83.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 82.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +1.9 pp
Court denial position: Rank 4 of 6 · 50th percentile
Judge outcome spread
6 qualifying direct judges · P25 83.1% · Median 85.4% · P75 88.5% · IQR 5.4%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.