Joshua D. Quidley at a glance
- Current role
- Immigration Judge
- Current assignment
- Baltimore Immigration Court
- Jurisdiction
- Maryland · Federal
- Judicial service
- Active
Joshua D. Quidley was appointed as a temporary immigration judge to begin hearing cases in April 2026. Judge Quidley earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2004 from Elizabeth City State University and a Juris Doctorate in 2007 from North Carolina Central University School of Law. From January 2019 to March 2026, when not serving in a uniform military capacity, he served as a disability evaluation system counsel at the U.S. Navy’s Office of the Judge Advocate General in Portsmouth, Virginia. From April 2025 to March 2026, he served as an attorney advisor at the Defense Logistics Agency, Joint Reserve Force, J-9. From October 2023 to March 2025, he served as a team chief/staff officer at the 134th Legal Operations Detachment in Garner, North Carolina. From October 2022 to September 2023, he served as a deputy chief of labor and employment law at the U.S. Army Reserve Command in Fort Bragg, North Carolina. From July 2017 to January 2019, he served as a chief of military justice and chief of operational law at the U.S. Army Reserve Command, Fort Bragg, North Carolina. From September 2016 to July 2017, he served as a special assistant U.S. attorney at the XVIII Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, North Carolina. From 2014 to 2016, he served as a civilian defense counsel in private practice, providing services in Northeastern North Carolina. From 2007 to 2014, he served as an assistant district attorney for the 1st Judicial District of North Carolina. He holds the rank of lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve. Judge Quidley is a member of the North Carolina Bar.
Immigration Judge · Baltimore Immigration Court
Historical EOIR data
National comparison for this selection: 9,249,024 outcomes; 10.0% relief granted; 52.0% denied / removal ordered; 38.0% other / procedural.
These are proceeding outcomes, not asylum application statistics. Completion years use EOIR COMP_DATE; 2026 contains partial-year data. Relief granted, denied / removal ordered and other / procedural exhaust the recorded outcomes. Groups of one are included. Historical outcomes do not establish a current assignment. Counts describe recorded cases and do not predict an individual's result.
Official EOIR case data · Source date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 14:14:27 GMT
For non-detained individual calendar hearings, advance filings are generally due at least 30 days before the hearing and responses are due within 10 days after the original filing; detained-case deadlines are set by the immigration judge.
For individual calendar hearings involving represented, non-detained aliens, amendments to applications for relief, additional supporting documents, updates to witness lists, and other such documents must be submitted at least thirty (30) days in advance of the individual calendar hearing.EOIR Policy Manual, Part II, Chapter 2.1 - Delivery and Receipt ↗
Briefs, motions, and exhibits should use consecutive page numbers, and proposed exhibits or supporting documents should include a table of contents identifying page numbers.
All documents, including briefs, motions, and exhibits, should always be paginated by consecutive numbers placed at the bottom center or bottom right-hand corner of each page.EOIR Policy Manual, Part II, Chapter 2.3 - Documents ↗
A witness list should identify each non-respondent witness, summarize the expected testimony, estimate its length, state the testimony language, and include a CV or resume for an expert.
A witness list should include the following information for each witness, except the respondent: the name of the witness; if applicable, the alien registration number (A number); a written summary of the testimony; the estimated length of the testimony; the language in which the witness will testify; and a curriculum vitae or resume, if called as an expert.EOIR Policy Manual, Part II, Chapter 2.3 - Documents ↗
A respondent or practitioner should request an interpreter no later than 30 days before the hearing at which interpreter services will be needed.
The respondent or the respondent’s attorney / practitioner of record should request an interpreter no later than 30 days before the next hearing where the interpreter services will be needed.EOIR Policy Manual, Part II, Chapter 3.10 - Interpreters ↗
Address the immigration judge as “Your Honor” or “Judge,” and stand when the judge enters and exits the courtroom.
The Immigration Judge should be addressed as either “Your Honor” or “Judge __.”EOIR Policy Manual, Part II, Chapter 3.11 - Courtroom Decorum ↗
Except when questioning witnesses, direct oral argument and statements to the immigration judge rather than debating the opposing party.
All oral argument and statements made during a hearing must be directed to the Immigration Judge.EOIR Policy Manual, Part II, Chapter 3.11 - Courtroom Decorum ↗
Only the immigration judge may record a hearing; practitioners of record may use silent electronic devices only for immediately relevant court business and subject to the judge’s control.
No device of any kind, including cameras, video recorders, and cassette recorders, may be used by any person other than the Immigration Judge to record any part of a hearing.EOIR Policy Manual, Part II, Chapter 3.12 - Electronic Devices ↗
At an individual calendar hearing, be prepared to make opening and closing statements, raise evidentiary objections, present witnesses and evidence, and cross-examine opposing witnesses.
While the Immigration Judge decides how each hearing is conducted, parties should be prepared to:EOIR Policy Manual, Part II, Chapter 3.15 - Individual Calendar Hearing ↗
If the hearing medium is uncertain or an internet-based hearing cannot be accessed, contact the hearing immigration court; unrepresented respondents default to in-person hearings.
Respondents who do not have a representative of record will always have a default hearing medium of in-person, regardless of the indication below.Find an Immigration Court and Access Internet-Based Hearings ↗
Photographing or recording any part of an internet-based immigration hearing is prohibited and may result in penalties.
Photographing or recording through the internet to capture any part of the hearing is strictly prohibited and subject to possible penalties.Find an Immigration Court and Access Internet-Based Hearings ↗
Baltimore Immigration Court
Immigration Court proceedings only, not BIA or OCAHO. Preserve chapter-specific proceeding limits. Section-specific exceptions, waivers, later amendments and case orders remain applicable. This is a source excerpt, not an exhaustive statement of the rule.
Official source ↗ · Collected 2026-10-27Baltimore Immigration Court
Immigration Court proceedings only, not BIA or OCAHO. Preserve chapter-specific proceeding limits. Section-specific exceptions, waivers, later amendments and case orders remain applicable. This is a source excerpt, not an exhaustive statement of the rule.
Official source ↗ · Collected 2026-10-27Baltimore Immigration Court
Immigration Court proceedings only, not BIA or OCAHO. Preserve chapter-specific proceeding limits. Section-specific exceptions, waivers, later amendments and case orders remain applicable. This is a source excerpt, not an exhaustive statement of the rule.
Official source ↗ · Collected 2026-10-27Identity source checked August 19, 2026.
Biography sources checked September 15, 2026.
Identity source · HTML · Source checked August 19, 2026
View DOJ EOIR current immigration judge directory ↗Courtwide source · HTML · Source checked July 30, 2026
View EOIR Policy Manual, Part II, Chapter 2.1 - Delivery and Receipt ↗Identity source · PDF · Source checked September 15, 2026
View EOIR Announces 15 Immigration Judges and 17 Temporary Immigration Judges ↗