Michael Adrian Ponsor at a glance
- Current role
- Senior Judge
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts · Federal
- Judicial service
- Active
Michael Adrian Ponsor
Senior Judge · U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Official statewide and applicable court procedural guidance applies to this judge.
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metrics
Biography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education record
Applicable Court Rules & Procedures2 sourced items · labeled by scope
SourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
Biography
Professional career
- Professional Career: Private practice, Boston, Massachusetts, 1976-1978
- Professional Career: Private practice, Amherst, Massachusetts, 1978-1983
- Professional Career: Adjunct professor, Western New England College of Law, 1988-
- Adjunct professor, Yale Law School, 1989-1991
- Adjunct professor, Western New England College of Law, 1988-present
- U.S. Magistrate, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, 1984-1994
- Private practice, Amherst, MA, 1978-1983
- Private practice, Boston, MA, 1976-1978
- Law clerk, Hon. Joseph Tauro, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, 1975-1976
Judicial service
- Judge, District Court, D. Massachusetts, 1994-2011
Education
- Harvard University · B.A., 1969
- Yale University · J.D., 1975
- Harvard University
- Harvard College
- Pembroke College
- University of Oxford · M.A., 1979
- Yale Law School
Personal record
Born 1946 · Chicago, IL
Applicable Court Rules & Procedures
Remote appearances
Courtwide
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Recording and broadcasting
Courtwide
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
View Federal Judicial Center biography ↗CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
View CourtListener judicial biographical directory ↗Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Courtwide source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
View Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Courtwide source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
View Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗