Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 380
- Any relief granted
- 50.3%
- Denied
- 49.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 47.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +2.0 pp
Court denial position: 28th percentile
Judge outcome spread
36 qualifying direct judges · P25 49.7% · Median 60.5% · P75 72.8% · IQR 23.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 473
- Any relief granted
- 27.3%
- Denied
- 72.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +1.2 pp
Court denial position: 57th percentile
Judge outcome spread
21 qualifying direct judges · P25 64.4% · Median 69.8% · P75 76.9% · IQR 12.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 295
- Any relief granted
- 35.6%
- Denied
- 64.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -7.1 pp
Court denial position: 29th percentile
Judge outcome spread
21 qualifying direct judges · P25 64.4% · Median 69.8% · P75 76.9% · IQR 12.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,111
- Any relief granted
- 33.4%
- Denied
- 66.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 52.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +14.0 pp
Court denial position: Rank 3 of 7 · 71st percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 62.1% · Median 65.9% · P75 66.8% · IQR 4.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 270
- Any relief granted
- 23.3%
- Denied
- 76.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 79.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -2.9 pp
Court denial position: 22nd percentile
Judge outcome spread
18 qualifying direct judges · P25 77.4% · Median 83.7% · P75 88.5% · IQR 11.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 533
- Any relief granted
- 69.0%
- Denied
- 31.0%
- Court denial benchmark
- 28.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +2.6 pp
Court denial position: Rank 5 of 6 · 33rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
6 qualifying direct judges · P25 35.1% · Median 49.2% · P75 55.0% · IQR 19.9%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 558
- Any relief granted
- 36.9%
- Denied
- 63.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 49.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +14.1 pp
Court denial position: 58th percentile
Judge outcome spread
12 qualifying direct judges · P25 54.7% · Median 62.0% · P75 70.5% · IQR 15.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 471
- Any relief granted
- 13.2%
- Denied
- 86.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 89.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -2.6 pp
Court denial position: 29th percentile
Judge outcome spread
14 qualifying direct judges · P25 86.9% · Median 89.3% · P75 92.1% · IQR 5.2%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 448
- Any relief granted
- 13.6%
- Denied
- 86.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +14.9 pp
Court denial position: 100th percentile
Judge outcome spread
21 qualifying direct judges · P25 64.4% · Median 69.8% · P75 76.9% · IQR 12.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,305
- Any relief granted
- 10.7%
- Denied
- 89.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 80.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +9.3 pp
Court denial position: Rank 2 of 6 · 83rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
6 qualifying direct judges · P25 81.9% · Median 86.9% · P75 88.7% · IQR 6.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.