United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

792 Judges · 74 EOIR Courts · Analytics

Immigration Judges Analytics

Compare source-linked asylum outcomes, decision volumes, and judge, court, and national benchmarks.

Analytics are linked to TRAC reports. 448 judges out of 792 total have personal analytical info below. How to read these figures: methodology and limitations

Find a judge or court

Judge denial rate vs court benchmark

Direct judge denial rates compared with court benchmarksEach point is a direct-data judge. The shaded band marks ten percentage points above or below the court benchmark. Hover for the judge name and rates. Select a point to open that judge's profile.Abby Meyer: 82.3% judge denial · 85.8% court benchmarkAbraham Burgess: 64.8% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkAdam Jovanovic: 90.7% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkAdam Panopoulos: 79.1% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkAdam Perl: 81.0% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkAggie Norregard: 87.6% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkAlec Niziolek: 85.5% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkAlex Perez: 87.2% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkAlexander Lee: 88.5% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkAlexandra Larsen: 84.7% judge denial · 85.8% court benchmarkAlice Hartye: 48.0% judge denial · 55.7% court benchmarkAlicia Brooks: 72.0% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkAlison Igoe: 57.9% judge denial · 57.6% court benchmarkAlison Kane: 45.7% judge denial · 58.1% court benchmarkAllan John-Baptiste: 79.0% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkAlysha Welsh: 86.7% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkAmanda Jeannopoulos: 38.1% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkAmelia Anderson: 66.3% judge denial · 54.6% court benchmarkAmy F. Haer: 79.2% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkAmy Lee: 84.1% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkAna L. Quiros: 73.0% judge denial · 57.6% court benchmarkAna Mencini: 60.8% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkAndrea Cole: 93.6% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkAndrea Hong: 73.0% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkAndrea Siebert: 62.1% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkAndrew Fishkin: 66.0% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkAndrew Hewitt: 93.6% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkAndrew M. Calvelli: 49.6% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkAndrew X. Stawar: 90.4% judge denial · 82.0% court benchmarkAnibal Martinez: 29.6% judge denial · 41.2% court benchmarkAnita McFadden: 76.4% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkAnita Simons: 60.7% judge denial · 61.2% court benchmarkAnn M. McDermott: 42.5% judge denial · 36.5% court benchmarkAnna Adams: 66.7% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkAnna C. Little: 39.4% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkAnne Kristina Perry: 54.1% judge denial · 42.0% court benchmarkAnthony J. Hurst: 100.0% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkAnthony Maingot: 42.1% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkAntonio Capistrano: 60.3% judge denial · 58.7% court benchmarkAnwer Khan: 88.9% judge denial · 86.1% court benchmarkArlene E. Dorfman: 59.8% judge denial · 60.4% court benchmarkArtie Pobjecky: 89.7% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkArya Ranasinghe: 57.3% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkAudra Behne: 79.5% judge denial · 61.2% court benchmarkAviva Poczter: 55.1% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkAyodele A. Gansallo: 27.4% judge denial · 57.6% court benchmarkBao Nguyen: 74.1% judge denial · 86.1% court benchmarkBarbara A. Nelson: 55.6% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkBenjamin D. Rosen: 83.4% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkBilly Sapp: 77.1% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkBlake Doughty: 87.2% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkBobbie C. Masters: 82.2% judge denial · 58.1% court benchmarkBrandi M. Lohr: 55.5% judge denial · 57.3% court benchmarkBrandon Hart: 82.9% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkBrandon Josephsen: 65.2% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkBrendan Curran: 60.7% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkBrent Jostad: 85.6% judge denial · 55.7% court benchmarkBrett Parchert: 66.7% judge denial · 73.9% court benchmarkBrian Burke: 82.1% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkBrian Palmer: 92.9% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkBrian Sardelli: 86.9% judge denial · 80.0% court benchmarkBrock Taylor: 40.4% judge denial · 70.2% court benchmarkBruce Imbacuan: 85.7% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkBruce Taylor: 80.5% judge denial · 77.1% court benchmarkBryan DePowell: 88.8% judge denial · 88.0% court benchmarkCarey Holliday: 99.5% judge denial · 97.3% court benchmarkCarlos Juelle: 85.2% judge denial · 61.2% court benchmarkCarol A. Crawford: 43.9% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkCarol Moore: 100.0% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkCarolyn L. Krasinski: 61.5% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkCarrie Johnson-Papillo: 75.0% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkCassie Thogersen: 94.1% judge denial · 97.3% court benchmarkCatherine Halliday-Roberts: 50.5% judge denial · 54.6% court benchmarkCathy Sagesse: 49.8% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkCharles Floyd: 74.4% judge denial · 78.4% court benchmarkCharles M. Ouslander: 80.2% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkCharles McCullough: 42.0% judge denial · 41.2% court benchmarkCharles Purnell: 97.8% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkCharles R. Conroy: 74.4% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkCharlotte Marquez: 80.8% judge denial · 69.3% court benchmarkChase Calder Cleveland: 88.1% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkChevone Sanon: 65.2% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkChris Brisack: 79.6% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkChristian Michael Pressman: 14.0% judge denial · 42.0% court benchmarkChristina Martyak: 89.5% judge denial · 85.1% court benchmarkChristine Lluis Reis: 73.3% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkChristine Olson: 77.4% judge denial · 62.3% court benchmarkChristopher Greer: 86.5% judge denial · 60.5% court benchmarkChristopher Phan: 85.1% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkChristopher Schumann: 83.9% judge denial · 82.0% court benchmarkChristopher Thielemann: 58.2% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkColin Johnson: 70.9% judge denial · 75.9% court benchmarkCourtney Stevens: 96.5% judge denial · 77.3% court benchmarkCraig DeFoe: 64.1% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkCurtis Pierce: 26.9% judge denial · 28.4% court benchmarkCurtis White: 77.7% judge denial · 88.0% court benchmarkCynthia Goodman: 89.5% judge denial · 81.9% court benchmarkCynthia Torg: 82.2% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkD'Anna H. Freeman: 96.9% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkDalin Holyoak: 65.5% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkDania Nassar: 64.7% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkDaniel A. Morris: 60.5% judge denial · 63.9% court benchmarkDaniel Conklin: 88.4% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkDaniel J. Daugherty: 50.8% judge denial · 36.5% court benchmarkDaniel Malvin: 49.8% judge denial · 61.2% court benchmarkDaniel Santander: 17.4% judge denial · 41.2% court benchmarkDanielle Garten: 94.8% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkDanny Razo: 75.0% judge denial · 64.3% court benchmarkDara F. Reid: 81.6% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkDavid Anderson: 29.2% judge denial · 36.9% court benchmarkDavid Evans: 66.7% judge denial · 60.5% court benchmarkDavid Gardey: 95.5% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkDavid Jones: 46.3% judge denial · 55.7% court benchmarkDavid Russo: 61.5% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkDavid Whipple: 39.3% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkDavid White: 97.4% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkDawn Kulick: 43.6% judge denial · 58.7% court benchmarkDean Tuckman: 74.3% judge denial · 78.5% court benchmarkDeborah E. Klahr: 51.8% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkDeepali Nadkarni: 73.1% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkDeitrich Sims: 84.3% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkDeLana Jones: 82.8% judge denial · 82.0% court benchmarkDelia I Gonzalez: 47.1% judge denial · 46.1% court benchmarkDenise Marks Lane: 65.5% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkDennis Ryan: 90.4% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkDiana L. Callaghan: 94.4% judge denial · 61.2% court benchmarkDiane L. Dodd: 66.4% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkDimple Gupta: 90.8% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkDinesh Verma: 38.3% judge denial · 55.7% court benchmarkDonald Eller: 91.6% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkDonald Pashayan: 84.5% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkDorothy Harbeck: 39.9% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkElizabeth Cottor: 86.9% judge denial · 85.0% court benchmarkElizabeth Kessler: 35.1% judge denial · 55.7% court benchmarkElizabeth Martinez: 42.5% judge denial · 41.2% court benchmarkElvin Talavera-Peraza: 92.8% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkEmily Farrar-Crockett: 76.8% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkEmmanuel Garcia: 94.5% judge denial · 77.3% court benchmarkEric Marsteller: 64.4% judge denial · 69.3% court benchmarkEric Schultz: 83.2% judge denial · 80.4% court benchmarkEric Tijerina: 43.4% judge denial · 41.2% court benchmarkEugene Robinson: 52.0% judge denial · 56.2% court benchmarkF. James Loprest Jr.: 16.2% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkFayaz Habib: 75.3% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkForrest Hoover: 48.3% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkFrancis Mwangi: 76.1% judge denial · 81.6% court benchmarkFrancisco Mendez: 79.0% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkFrancisco R. Prieto: 67.5% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkFrank Pimentel: 73.1% judge denial · 76.9% court benchmarkFrank Seminerio: 71.5% judge denial · 28.4% court benchmarkGary Endelman: 83.2% judge denial · 86.1% court benchmarkGeoffrey Hoffman: 78.1% judge denial · 82.0% court benchmarkGeorge Ward: 91.9% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkGeorgina Picos: 82.6% judge denial · 86.1% court benchmarkGhunise L. Coaxum: 91.0% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkGilda Terrazas: 57.0% judge denial · 27.0% court benchmarkGioia Maiellano: 69.7% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkGregory Simmons: 56.4% judge denial · 28.4% court benchmarkGuy Grande: 64.5% judge denial · 56.2% court benchmarkHayden Windrow: 69.2% judge denial · 73.9% court benchmarkHeather Libeu: 87.6% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkHolly D'Andrea: 74.9% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkHoward Hom: 79.6% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkHugo Martinez: 90.9% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkHye Chon: 81.3% judge denial · 60.4% court benchmarkIan Simons: 58.8% judge denial · 67.3% court benchmarkIllya-Karina Bonet: 75.9% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkIman Ghasri: 82.7% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkIrene Recio: 59.6% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkIrma Diaz: 86.7% judge denial · 57.6% court benchmarkIrma Newburn: 80.3% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkIvan Gardzelewski: 63.1% judge denial · 58.1% court benchmarkJacinto Palomino: 76.4% judge denial · 70.2% court benchmarkJacob Bashore: 84.6% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkJacob J. Stender: 49.6% judge denial · 51.4% court benchmarkJacquelyn Jo. Joyce: 86.8% judge denial · 82.0% court benchmarkJaime Jasso: 59.5% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkJames Crofts: 93.3% judge denial · 83.1% court benchmarkJames Dehn: 68.8% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkJames F. Polivka: 75.8% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkJames Graulich: 90.0% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkJames M. McCarthy: 57.1% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkJames Miller Jr.: 73.6% judge denial · 64.3% court benchmarkJames Nugent: 21.2% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkJames R. McKee: 85.4% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkJane Miller: 96.9% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkJason Braun: 65.6% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkJason Hermus: 97.4% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkJason L. Stern: 93.0% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkJason Pope: 59.1% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkJason Waterloo: 45.7% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkJavier Balasquide: 73.1% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkJayme Salinardi: 78.9% judge denial · 75.9% court benchmarkJeannette Park: 44.1% judge denial · 60.4% court benchmarkJeffrey Frederick: 82.8% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkJeffrey Munoz: 30.8% judge denial · 42.0% court benchmarkJeffrey Sprague: 89.9% judge denial · 55.7% court benchmarkJennifer Chung: 66.7% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkJennifer Gaz: 36.2% judge denial · 69.2% court benchmarkJennifer May: 91.8% judge denial · 81.6% court benchmarkJennifer Page-Lozano: 73.7% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkJennifer Piateski: 75.1% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkJennifer R. Bell: 62.2% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkJennifer Riedthaler-Williams: 72.7% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkJennifer Winfield: 73.4% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkJeremy Santoro: 76.2% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkJerrica Harness: 80.0% judge denial · 78.6% court benchmarkJohn C. Barnes: 90.7% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkJohn Carle: 53.3% judge denial · 58.7% court benchmarkJohn Cortes: 87.9% judge denial · 85.0% court benchmarkJohn DeCure: 74.0% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkJohn Furlong Jr.: 65.9% judge denial · 52.6% court benchmarkJohn Gillies: 45.2% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkJohn J. Siemietkowski: 65.9% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkJohn McPhail: 93.2% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkJohn Odell: 74.3% judge denial · 78.4% court benchmarkJohn P. Burns: 96.1% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkJohn Rubenstein: 65.0% judge denial · 57.6% court benchmarkJonathan Huang: 84.6% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkJonathan Owens: 71.4% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkJonathan Reingold: 59.4% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkJonathan W. Hitesman: 67.4% judge denial · 27.0% court benchmarkJorge Pereira: 87.3% judge denial · 85.1% court benchmarkJose Penalosa: 86.3% judge denial · 54.6% court benchmarkJoseph Kassell: 87.7% judge denial · 55.7% court benchmarkJoseph Leonard: 37.4% judge denial · 46.1% court benchmarkJoseph Scott: 56.7% judge denial · 58.7% court benchmarkJoseph Weiner: 66.7% judge denial · 60.4% court benchmarkJoshua Luskin: 39.0% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkJoshua Osborn: 89.8% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkJoyce Bakke Varzandeh: 51.7% judge denial · 61.2% court benchmarkJoyce Noche: 68.5% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkJuan Román: 99.1% judge denial · 85.8% court benchmarkJudith Bonilla: 36.1% judge denial · 64.3% court benchmarkJulia Diaz-Rex: 89.5% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkJulia Egy: 71.2% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkJulian Castaneda: 44.8% judge denial · 46.1% court benchmarkJulie Nelson: 83.3% judge denial · 51.4% court benchmarkJune Lee: 77.3% judge denial · 57.6% court benchmarkJustin Adams: 80.9% judge denial · 82.8% court benchmarkKalenna Lee: 68.5% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkKalin Ivany: 86.8% judge denial · 80.0% court benchmarkKandra Robbins: 78.8% judge denial · 81.6% court benchmarkKaren Nazaire: 99.0% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkKaren Y. Hope: 92.2% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkKatherine Hansen: 34.4% judge denial · 80.0% court benchmarkKathryn DeAngelis: 65.3% judge denial · 75.0% court benchmarkKatie Mullins: 92.7% judge denial · 88.0% court benchmarkKelly Johnson: 91.2% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkKelly Lake: 67.4% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkKenneth Shahan: 90.9% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkKenneth Sogabe: 85.8% judge denial · 73.9% court benchmarkKenya Wells: 93.9% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkKevin Brown: 89.1% judge denial · 82.0% court benchmarkKevin Gross: 95.2% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkKevin Riley: 77.7% judge denial · 60.4% court benchmarkKevin Stanley: 77.4% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkKevin Terrill: 93.8% judge denial · 82.8% court benchmarkKiera Parikh: 98.7% judge denial · 86.1% court benchmarkKristie Anne Padron: 62.1% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkKristin Piepmeier: 80.3% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkKuyomars Golparvar: 84.8% judge denial · 55.7% court benchmarkKyung Auh: 64.8% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkLakshmi Herman: 76.9% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkLaura Figueroa: 86.8% judge denial · 77.3% court benchmarkLaura Wyrosdick: 51.0% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkLauren F. Farber: 23.9% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkLeila Mullican: 94.4% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkLena Golovnin: 39.7% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkLeon Francis: 76.1% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkLettricea Jefferson-Webb: 78.2% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkLily Hsu: 67.3% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkLinda Hristova: 98.5% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkLindsay W. Pepi: 89.8% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkLindsy R. Roberts: 29.4% judge denial · 36.5% court benchmarkLisa de Cardona: 91.3% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkLisa W. Ling: 62.0% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkLolita Lukose: 74.6% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkLorely Fernandez: 96.5% judge denial · 69.3% court benchmarkLorianne M. Campanella: 82.1% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkLourdes Martinez-Esquivel: 81.8% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkLourdes Rodriguez de Jongh: 53.4% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkLucy Baez: 90.8% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkLuisa Santiago: 78.1% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkLuther Snavely: 90.7% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkLydia Tamez: 86.5% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkLynn Wang: 93.6% judge denial · 86.1% court benchmarkMadeline Garcia: 77.2% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkMaithe Gonzalez: 84.2% judge denial · 81.6% court benchmarkMarc Stahl: 47.6% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkMargaret Kolbe: 38.7% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkMargaret R. MacGregor: 63.3% judge denial · 76.9% court benchmarkMaria Akalski: 93.3% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkMaria Jaimes-Salgado: 84.1% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkMaria T. Ubarri: 39.6% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkMario Sturla: 63.3% judge denial · 52.6% court benchmarkMaritza Ramos: 88.9% judge denial · 86.1% court benchmarkMark Jebson: 81.9% judge denial · 67.3% court benchmarkMark Sameit: 55.4% judge denial · 56.2% court benchmarkMarlem Nava: 63.7% judge denial · 51.4% court benchmarkMarni Guerrero: 83.5% judge denial · 77.1% court benchmarkMarsha Nettles: 61.4% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkMary C. Baumgarten: 80.9% judge denial · 57.3% court benchmarkMary Futcher: 70.5% judge denial · 58.7% court benchmarkMary Lee: 60.7% judge denial · 58.7% court benchmarkMatthew C. Beese: 85.8% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkMatthew Chan: 64.4% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkMatthew Gordon: 60.4% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkMatthew Morrissey: 90.6% judge denial · 85.8% court benchmarkMatthew W. Kaufman: 39.9% judge denial · 58.1% court benchmarkMelissa Fox: 81.9% judge denial · 58.7% court benchmarkMelissa Karlen: 73.3% judge denial · 85.0% court benchmarkMeredith Tyrakoski: 43.3% judge denial · 41.2% court benchmarkMichael Klosowsky: 65.4% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkMichael Lewis: 85.1% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkMichael Neal: 83.0% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkMichael Pleters: 79.8% judge denial · 78.5% court benchmarkMichael Schnitzer: 80.7% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkMichael Tisocco: 87.1% judge denial · 73.9% court benchmarkMichael Tripi: 82.7% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkMichael W. Lloyd: 49.7% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkMichael Walleisa: 72.7% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkMichelle Araneta: 64.4% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkMichelle Kahan: 66.6% judge denial · 52.6% court benchmarkMichelle Lakomy: 76.7% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkMichelle Slayton: 31.0% judge denial · 28.4% court benchmarkMichelle Venci: 63.1% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkMonica Guidry: 86.8% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkMonica Neumann: 86.4% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkMonte Miller: 89.3% judge denial · 80.0% court benchmarkMunish Sharda: 88.1% judge denial · 85.0% court benchmarkNancy Miller: 74.3% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkNatalie Huddleston: 77.8% judge denial · 77.1% court benchmarkNatalie Smith: 66.9% judge denial · 52.6% court benchmarkNathan Herbert: 57.7% judge denial · 64.3% court benchmarkNathan M. Hansen: 98.9% judge denial · 80.0% court benchmarkNathaniel B. Walker: 76.7% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkNicholas Martz: 97.2% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkNicholle Hempel: 88.8% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkNicolas Orechwa: 84.1% judge denial · 69.2% court benchmarkNicole Lane: 83.3% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkNimmo Bhagat: 83.4% judge denial · 86.1% court benchmarkNina M. Carbone: 70.8% judge denial · 77.4% court benchmarkNjeri Maldonado: 86.3% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkOlga Attia: 78.4% judge denial · 54.6% court benchmarkOshea Spencer: 92.5% judge denial · 89.4% court benchmarkPallavi Shirole: 58.4% judge denial · 55.7% court benchmarkPatrick Barrett: 89.9% judge denial · 88.0% court benchmarkPatrick Burke: 86.3% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkPatrick E. Moore: 98.0% judge denial · 97.3% court benchmarkPatrick McKenna: 57.1% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkPaul Habich: 26.6% judge denial · 69.2% court benchmarkPaul Hable: 78.2% judge denial · 76.9% court benchmarkPaul McCloskey: 89.1% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkPaul Medved: 86.6% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkPedro Espinal: 92.2% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkPeter A. Kim: 42.5% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkPhilip P. Taylor: 80.5% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkRachel Ruane: 70.1% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkRalph Girvin: 84.8% judge denial · 70.2% court benchmarkRamin Rastegar: 63.9% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkRandall Fluke: 76.0% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkRaphael Choi: 93.6% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkRaphael Rojas: 68.5% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkRavit Halperin: 93.5% judge denial · 88.0% court benchmarkRebecca Niburg: 57.4% judge denial · 57.6% court benchmarkRene Mateo: 67.1% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkRichard B. Cato: 54.3% judge denial · 52.6% court benchmarkRichard Drucker: 81.4% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkRichard Jacobs: 92.5% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkRichard Jamadar: 58.0% judge denial · 72.3% court benchmarkRichard Vanveldhuisen: 79.3% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkRico Sogocio: 74.3% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkRifian Newaz: 56.2% judge denial · 41.2% court benchmarkRobert K. Lundberg: 85.5% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkRobert L. Gundlach: 56.9% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkRobert Lewandowski: 96.4% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkRobert McSeveney: 64.9% judge denial · 73.9% court benchmarkRobert P. Driscoll: 76.1% judge denial · 80.4% court benchmarkRobert Powell: 83.8% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkRoberto Amaya: 89.7% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkRodger Harris: 68.3% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkRoel Canales: 88.3% judge denial · 77.3% court benchmarkRomaine White: 97.4% judge denial · 97.3% court benchmarkRomy Lerner: 75.0% judge denial · 85.1% court benchmarkRyan Fisher: 86.1% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkSam Brown: 95.9% judge denial · 86.1% court benchmarkSamia Naseem: 37.2% judge denial · 49.0% court benchmarkSamuel G. Williams: 96.5% judge denial · 70.2% court benchmarkSandra Santos-Garcia: 58.5% judge denial · 60.4% court benchmarkSarah B. Yeomans: 68.0% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkSarah Mazzie: 80.2% judge denial · 80.0% court benchmarkSaul Greenstein: 86.3% judge denial · 86.1% court benchmarkScott Alexander: 69.8% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkScott Bratton: 87.5% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkScott Criss: 75.4% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkScott Thomsen: 78.6% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkShadee M. Star: 69.9% judge denial · 51.4% court benchmarkShana Chen: 80.3% judge denial · 70.3% court benchmarkShane Johnson: 81.8% judge denial · 73.9% court benchmarkShaSha Xu: 72.1% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkShayne R. Burnham: 59.8% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkSherease R. Pratt: 85.3% judge denial · 79.6% court benchmarkSherron Ashworth: 83.6% judge denial · 81.9% court benchmarkShirley Lazare-Raphael: 75.8% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkStephen Mander: 55.5% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkStephen Ruhle: 74.1% judge denial · 78.5% court benchmarkStephen Stewart: 95.0% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkSteve Mannion: 89.1% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkSteven Fuller: 82.5% judge denial · 78.6% court benchmarkSteven Kirchner: 47.5% judge denial · 28.4% court benchmarkSteven Marcus: 74.2% judge denial · 60.4% court benchmarkStuart Alcorn: 71.2% judge denial · 82.8% court benchmarkStuart Siegel: 81.2% judge denial · 85.1% court benchmarkSusan Phan: 50.9% judge denial · 28.4% court benchmarkSuzette Smikle: 83.2% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkTaiyyeba S. Skomra: 53.1% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkTamar Wilson: 92.3% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkTammy Fitting: 41.2% judge denial · 73.9% court benchmarkTanawa Lebreton: 51.9% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkTara Naselow-Nahas: 85.5% judge denial · 60.4% court benchmarkTeresa L. Riley: 80.4% judge denial · 79.2% court benchmarkTerese Tadros-Ibarra: 62.3% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkThanos Kanellakos: 67.7% judge denial · 57.6% court benchmarkThomas Ayze: 83.7% judge denial · 71.5% court benchmarkThomas Crossan: 33.6% judge denial · 41.2% court benchmarkTiesha Peal: 78.6% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkTimothy Everett: 58.9% judge denial · 65.4% court benchmarkTimothy M. Cole: 93.0% judge denial · 84.7% court benchmarkTodd A. Masters: 60.8% judge denial · 52.6% court benchmarkTyler Wood: 82.5% judge denial · 58.1% court benchmarkUbaid ul-Haq: 81.3% judge denial · 60.9% court benchmarkValerie Burch: 82.4% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmarkVeronica Segovia: 90.2% judge denial · 82.8% court benchmarkVeronica Villegas: 54.4% judge denial · 61.2% court benchmarkVictoria Levin: 61.7% judge denial · 77.1% court benchmarkVirna Wright: 48.1% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkWade Napier: 81.9% judge denial · 55.7% court benchmarkWilbur Lee: 88.1% judge denial · 76.5% court benchmarkWilliam H. McDermott: 21.3% judge denial · 47.7% court benchmarkWinfield Murray: 60.9% judge denial · 82.4% court benchmarkXavier Racine: 68.7% judge denial · 71.6% court benchmarkXiomara Davis-Gumbs: 62.5% judge denial · 70.1% court benchmarkYon Alberdi: 97.9% judge denial · 85.1% court benchmarkYul-mi Cho: 78.9% judge denial · 52.6% court benchmarkYvan Murad: 78.4% judge denial · 61.2% court benchmarkYvonne Gonzalez: 26.1% judge denial · 41.2% court benchmarkZol Rainey: 90.0% judge denial · 86.7% court benchmark0%100%100%

X = court denial benchmark · Y = direct judge denial rate · diagonal = equal to court benchmark · 448 direct-data judges plotted · descriptive context, not a ranking. Chart points are small on touch screens; browse the judge results to open a profile. Open detailed plot.

U.S. asylum outcomes by fiscal year

National totals and outcome rates

U.S. outcome rates by fiscal year0%25%50%75%100%FY2021: 43.9% any relief grantedFY2021: 56.1% deniedFY2021FY2022: 51.1% any relief grantedFY2022: 48.9% deniedFY2022FY2023: 53.0% any relief grantedFY2023: 47.0% deniedFY2023FY2024: 51.1% any relief grantedFY2024: 48.9% deniedFY2024FY2025: 30.7% any relief grantedFY2025: 69.3% deniedFY2025FY2026: 12.9% any relief grantedFY2026: 87.1% deniedFY2026YTD
Fiscal yearCases decided (N)Any relief grantedDenied
FY202127,01643.9%56.1%
FY202256,28451.1%48.9%
FY202376,59353.0%47.0%
FY202481,80551.1%48.9%
FY2025122,86230.7%69.3%
FY2026106,26412.9%87.1%

Precomputed from exact TRAC aggregate counts; asylum granted + other relief granted = any relief granted, and outcomes sum to N. FY2026 is year-to-date through the published source cutoff. No values are interpolated. TRAC aggregate source · retrieved 2026-08-30. Methodology.

448 judges · page 40 of 45

Direct judge data

Sarah B. Yeomans

Current EOIR assignment: Sterling Immigration Court

TRAC report court: Sterling Immigration Court

FY 2021 - 2026*

Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source

Decisions
826
Any relief granted
32.0%
Denied
68.0%
Court denial benchmark
71.6%
U.S. denial benchmark
62.9%
Outcome difference vs court
-3.6 pp

Court denial position: 38th percentile

Judge outcome spread

13 qualifying direct judges · P25 62.1% · Median 68.8% · P75 75.9% · IQR 13.8%

Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.

Annual denial trend

Annual trend unavailable.

Annual trend source

Direct judge data

Sarah Mazzie

Current EOIR assignment: Fort Snelling Immigration Court

TRAC report court: Bloomington Immigration Court

FY 2021 - 2026*

Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source

Decisions
747
Any relief granted
19.8%
Denied
80.2%
Court denial benchmark
80.0%
U.S. denial benchmark
62.9%
Outcome difference vs court
+0.2 pp

Court denial position: Rank 5 of 6 · 33rd percentile

Judge outcome spread

6 qualifying direct judges · P25 81.9% · Median 86.9% · P75 88.7% · IQR 6.8%

Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.

Annual denial trend

Annual trend unavailable.

Annual trend source

Direct judge data

Saul Greenstein

Current EOIR assignment: Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court

TRAC report court: Houston Immigration Court

FY 2021 - 2026*

Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source

Decisions
844
Any relief granted
13.7%
Denied
86.3%
Court denial benchmark
86.1%
U.S. denial benchmark
62.9%
Outcome difference vs court
+0.2 pp

Court denial position: Rank 6 of 10 · 50th percentile

Judge outcome spread

10 qualifying direct judges · P25 83.3% · Median 87.6% · P75 92.4% · IQR 9.1%

Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.

Annual denial trend

Annual trend unavailable.

Annual trend source

Direct judge data

Scott Alexander

Current EOIR assignment: Miami Immigration Court

TRAC report court: Miami Immigration Court

FY 2021 - 2026*

Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source

Decisions
514
Any relief granted
30.2%
Denied
69.8%
Court denial benchmark
71.5%
U.S. denial benchmark
62.9%
Outcome difference vs court
-1.7 pp

Court denial position: 52nd percentile

Judge outcome spread

21 qualifying direct judges · P25 64.4% · Median 69.8% · P75 76.9% · IQR 12.5%

Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.

Annual denial trend

Annual trend unavailable.

Annual trend source

Direct judge data

Scott Bratton

Current EOIR assignment: Indianapolis Immigration Court

TRAC report court: Indianapolis Immigration Court

FY 2021 - 2026*

Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source

Decisions
647
Any relief granted
12.5%
Denied
87.5%
Court denial benchmark
86.7%
U.S. denial benchmark
62.9%
Outcome difference vs court
+0.8 pp

Court denial position: Rank 3 of 5 · 60th percentile

Judge outcome spread

5 qualifying direct judges · P25 82.4% · Median 87.5% · P75 88.4% · IQR 6.0%

Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.

Annual denial trend

Annual trend unavailable.

Annual trend source

Direct judge data

Scott Criss

Current EOIR assignment: Charlotte Immigration Court

TRAC report court: Charlotte Immigration Court

FY 2021 - 2026*

Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source

Decisions
560
Any relief granted
24.6%
Denied
75.4%
Court denial benchmark
86.7%
U.S. denial benchmark
62.9%
Outcome difference vs court
-11.3 pp

Court denial position: 14th percentile

Judge outcome spread

14 qualifying direct judges · P25 89.3% · Median 91.6% · P75 96.1% · IQR 6.8%

Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.

Annual denial trend

Annual trend unavailable.

Annual trend source

Direct judge data

Scott Thomsen

Current EOIR assignment: Indianapolis Immigration Court

TRAC report court: Indianapolis Immigration Court

FY 2021 - 2026*

Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source

Decisions
584
Any relief granted
21.4%
Denied
78.6%
Court denial benchmark
86.7%
U.S. denial benchmark
62.9%
Outcome difference vs court
-8.1 pp

Court denial position: Rank 5 of 5 · 20th percentile

Judge outcome spread

5 qualifying direct judges · P25 82.4% · Median 87.5% · P75 88.4% · IQR 6.0%

Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.

Annual denial trend

Annual trend unavailable.

Annual trend source

Direct judge data

Shadee M. Star

Current EOIR assignment: Concord Immigration Court

TRAC report court: Concord Immigration Court

FY 2021 - 2026*

Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source

Decisions
312
Any relief granted
30.1%
Denied
69.9%
Court denial benchmark
51.4%
U.S. denial benchmark
62.9%
Outcome difference vs court
+18.5 pp

Annual denial trend

Annual trend unavailable.

Annual trend source

Direct judge data

Shana Chen

Current EOIR assignment: Newark Immigration Court

TRAC report court: Newark Immigration Court

FY 2021 - 2026*

Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source

Decisions
898
Any relief granted
19.7%
Denied
80.3%
Court denial benchmark
70.3%
U.S. denial benchmark
62.9%
Outcome difference vs court
+10.0 pp

Court denial position: 55th percentile

Judge outcome spread

11 qualifying direct judges · P25 58.2% · Median 80.3% · P75 88.3% · IQR 30.1%

Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.

Annual denial trend

Annual trend unavailable.

Annual trend source

Direct judge data

Shane Johnson

Current EOIR assignment: Seattle Immigration Court

TRAC report court: Seattle Immigration Court

FY 2021 - 2026*

Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source

Decisions
1,613
Any relief granted
18.2%
Denied
81.8%
Court denial benchmark
73.9%
U.S. denial benchmark
62.9%
Outcome difference vs court
+7.9 pp

Court denial position: Rank 3 of 7 · 71st percentile

Judge outcome spread

7 qualifying direct judges · P25 65.8% · Median 69.2% · P75 83.8% · IQR 18.0%

Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.

Annual denial trend

Annual trend unavailable.

Annual trend source