Court directory

Indianapolis Immigration Court

Contact and location

Physical address: Minton-Capehart Federal Building, 575 N. Pennsylvania St, Ste 617, Indianapolis, IN 46204
Phone: (317) 464-1399
Email: Indianapolis.Immigration.Court@usdoj.gov
Asylum EAD clock: Asylum.Clock.INP@usdoj.gov
Filing hours: Window Filing Hours: Monday through Friday8:15 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.12:30 p.m. – 2 p.m.3:30 p.m. – 4 p.m.The immigration court is open to receive documents for filing each business day. No documents will be accepted after 4 p.m.
Case information: (800) 898-7180
Court administrator: Natalie Meyers (Acting)
Court status: OPEN
Public hours: * Court Hours: 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.; * Window Filing Hours: Monday through Friday; * 8:15 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.; * 12:30 p.m. – 2 p.m.; * 3:30 p.m. – 4 p.m.; * The immigration court is open to receive documents for filing each business day. No documents will be accepted after 4 p.m.; The immigration court is open Monday to Friday except for federal holidays. The Office of Personnel Management publishes a list of the observed dates of every federal holiday by year online at this link: . Additionally, the court may have to unexpectedly close due to inclement weather or for another emergency or reason.; When necessary, information on immigration court closures or changes to the immigration court’s operating hours is available on EOIR's , , and .

Historical EOIR data

Outcomes at a glance

Year Nationality

Total outcomes: 13,848
Relief granted: 596 4.3%
Denied / removal ordered: 11,527 83.2%
Other / procedural: 1,725 12.5%

National comparison for this selection: 9,249,024 outcomes; 10.0% relief granted; 52.0% denied / removal ordered; 38.0% other / procedural.

Methodology and sources

These are proceeding outcomes, not asylum application statistics. Completion years use EOIR COMP_DATE; 2026 contains partial-year data. Relief granted, denied / removal ordered and other / procedural exhaust the recorded outcomes. Groups of one are included. Historical outcomes do not establish a current assignment. Counts describe recorded cases and do not predict an individual's result.

Official EOIR case data · Source date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 14:14:27 GMT

Asylum decisions — separate dataset

Immigration court analytics

Current assignments and source-period outcomes are shown separately

Current judicial assignments are listed in Assigned Judges above. The outcome reports below reflect their stated source periods.

Judges with direct TRAC reports in this analytics snapshot: 5.

Current aggregate decisions: 3,801
Any relief granted: 13.3%
Denied: 86.7%

Current benchmark period: FY 2021 - 2026*. This is a court aggregate, not an individual judge result.

Direct same-period judge outcome spread

5 direct reports · FY 2021 - 2026* · denial range 78.6%–96.9%.

P25 82.4% · median 87.5% · P75 88.4% · IQR 6.0%.

View historical TRAC report associations

Daniel Conklin · N=704 · denied 88.4% · TRAC report
Jane Miller · N=573 · denied 96.9% · TRAC report
Scott Bratton · N=647 · denied 87.5% · TRAC report
Scott Thomsen · N=584 · denied 78.6% · TRAC report
Valerie Burch · N=557 · denied 82.4% · TRAC report

These historical report associations are separate from the current court roster. Cohorts require at least five direct reports for the same report court and reporting period.

Court and U.S. annual outcomes

Exact aggregate fiscal-year counts

Fiscal year	Indianapolis Immigration Court cases (N)	Indianapolis Immigration Court any relief	Indianapolis Immigration Court denied	U.S. any relief	U.S. denied
FY2025	1,664	21.8%	78.2%	30.7%	69.3%
FY2026	2,137	6.7%	93.3%	12.9%	87.1%

Precomputed from exact TRAC aggregate counts; asylum granted + other relief granted = any relief granted, and outcomes sum to N. FY2026 is year-to-date through the published source cutoff. No values are interpolated. TRAC aggregate source · retrieved 2026-08-30. Methodology.

These figures cover completed asylum decisions in TRAC's published data, not all immigration-court matters. Outcomes may reflect case mix, representation, nationality, detention status, policy, and other factors; they are not a judge quality score. Read the methodology.